| |
|
|
By Rob Charles [ 24/10/2007 ] Publishing Free Articles Zone articles is subject to our Publisher's Terms Of Service |
|
When the question of what Performance Management is and what it entails is asked
in any organisation, there are as many answers and perceptions as there are people
in the organisation. The Human Resources Department will tell you that Performance
Management entails the training, mentoring and development of employees; the
Finance Department will tell that Performance Management is the measurement of
a series of financial and non financial indicators; the IT Department will tell
you that Performance Management is the “system” used to manage performance
in an organisation. Though none of these perceptions are incorrect, they are
only part of the truth.
To complicate matters even further, numerous management methodologies have been
introduced over the years, which all claim to be the silver bullet when
managing performance. Concepts such as the Balanced Scorecard, Value Based Management,
Total Quality Management and Six Sigma are commonplace in most managers’ vocabulary.
Perhaps the starkest reality when attempting to sift through the information
overload is not the lack of information and methodologies available to design
and implement a performance management system, but the realisation that there
is no silver bullet that can create a successful performance management system.
Managers cannot delegate what is effectively their job to a “system”. To ensure
the success of a performance management system, managers have to devote a significant
amount of their time to the process. Often the success or failure of a performance
management system has less to do with the chosen metrics and templates used for
managing the system, and more to do with the honesty and rigor used in the process.
All too often, performance management systems fail because they are either measurement
systems, where little is done to interpret the results and take corrective action,
or the system is simply delegated to the bottom drawer because it is cumbersome
and managers have not bought into the process.
A well-designed and implemented performance management system will ensure that
there is open and honest communication between all layers of the organisation.
It will ensure that managers have the authority to manage, while there is an
assurance to their bosses that agreed levels of performance will be met. A good
performance management system should focus not only on the achievement of a metric
but also on the reasons behind the achievement or non-achievement of the metric
in relation to a target. Unfortunately there is no magic formula for designing an
effective performance management system, but there are a number of factors which
differentiate between success and failure. Performance Management implementation
either succeeds or fails, based on whether the management buys into the process.
If a robust change
management process does not run alongside the process of implementing
performance management, it is bound to fail. Complete management buy-in at all
levels is crucial to ensuring the success of the system. The change management
process and associated training will ensure that a culture of value creation is
instilled throughout the business. It is important for all employees to understand
the concept of value creation as well as understanding how their decisions and
actions influence value creation. This understanding can be achieved by top management
members who consistently reinforce the importance of the value creation mindset
in all their communication to the rest of the organisation. Ultimately the senior
management must lead by example and walk the talk. Senior managers, who cut the
budgets for employee development and training to meet short-term profit objectives,
are unlikely to inspire a culture of long-term value creation among the members
of their middle management team.
Performance Management relies on measuring performance and on taking corrective
action when the targets set for the performance metrics are not met. What is
measured will ultimately impact on people’s behaviour, therefore it is important to
ensure that due consideration is given to identifying the value drivers that define
the short-term performance and long-term health of the business. It is important
for managers to have a clear understanding about what the business’s value
drivers are, as this will ensure that managers can understand and analyse the trade-offs
required to balance short-term performance against long-term health. For example,
reducing Research and Development costs may bolster short-term performance but could
have disastrous consequences for the business in the long term. When identifying
the priority value drivers, it is important to take the following into account:
About the author:
Leslie Yuill is a Director of Cle Human Capital (Pty) Ltd, a firm of market-leading Reward, Compensation and Performance Management Consultants.
Article Source: http://www.Free-Articles-Zone.com