free-articles-zone.com

תפריט Free Articles

Free Articles Authors

Publishers Zone

מאמרים
Free Articles


Free Articles DB search

Did Israel use disproportionate force in Gaza?


Category: News and Society  >>  Politics

By Michal Moreno   [ 17/09/2009 ]
 | [ viewed 31 times ] Article word count: 297  

Publishing Free Articles Zone articles is subject to our Publisher's Terms Of Service

 Add to Favorites
 Email to a friend
 Publish this Article
 Print this article
 Article direct link
 email Article Author
 Report this article
                                                                                         

In addition to the principle of distinction, customary international law bars military attacks that are anticipated to harm civilians excessively in relation to the expected military advantage. This is known as the "principle of proportionality." The very notion of not inflicting "excessive" harm recognizes that some civilian casualties may be unavoidable when pursuing legitimate military objectives.

By definition, then, evaluation of proportionality (or excessive harm to civilians compared to military advantage) requires balancing two very different sets of values and objectives. States have duties to protect the lives of their civilians and soldiers, but they must balance this against their duty to minimize incidental loss of civilian lives and civilian property during military operations. That is precisely the reason that international law assesses proportionality from the standpoint of a "reasonable military commander," and the balancing may not be second-guessed in hindsight, based on new information that has come to light.

As with the principle of distinction, a showing of intent is required for there to have been any arguable "war crime" based on excessive civilian harm in comparison with military objectives. In other words, the existence of a war crime turns not on the reasonableness of the commander's weighing of military advantage against civilian harm, but on whether he or she knew that the attack would cause clearly disproportionate harm, but proceeded intentionally, notwithstanding this knowledge.

The IDF took extensive steps to weigh the risk of civilian harm against the existence of important military objectives, based on the information available at the time of targeting decisions. On numerous occasions, The IDF's situation analysis frequently led to a decision not to attack legitimate military targets, to avoid the possibility of civilian harm, even though such an attack might not be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.



About the author:
For more information visit Gaza Facts website.

Article Source: http://www.Free-Articles-Zone.com


Article tags: cast lead, hamas, goldstone
 

     Recent articles about Politics

     Most popular articles about Politics

     More articles by Michal Moreno

Recent article RSS  |  Business | Finance | Computers and Technology | Arts and Entertainment | Internet and Online Businesses | Health and Fitness | Self improvement | Sports and Recreation | Education and Reference | Fashion | Automotive | Legal | Home and Family | Travel | Food and Drink | News and Society | Shopping and Product Reviews | Communications | Insurance | Real Estate | Home Improvement | Pets | Cancer |
© 2008 All Rights Reserved. Free Articles | online marketing
Israel Travel | Israel Spa