Pros and cons of different approaches for decision making

                                                                                         

Whether your business or professional career meets success or an abrupt failure, it is going to depend largely on your decision making skills. The difference between a successful entrepreneur and a failed businessman is basically the effectiveness of decisions they will make in critical situations. Some have this ability to hit the nail on the head while others waste time in pointless arguments and analysis. Making right decision is of use only if made at the right time, not after you have suffered the loss.

So how can you prepare yourself to make correct and timely decisions? Do your decision making style really affects the appropriateness of your decision? Read on to know the answers.

The importance of Discussions:
Discussions are very important, even if the point in discussion does not affect anyone else but you. Discussion is not about asking someone else to assess the situation and come up with a solution, because you are not capable to do so. It should be a dialogue between you and other concerned persons, where everybody comes up with their own viewpoints and ideas. A decision made after some healthy discussions and with majority's consent is supposed to be a more sound one, as it has been pored over and scrutinized by a group of people (and not just one person).

Democratic approach vs. the despotic style:
There are two ways to settle on a decision after sufficient discussions and arguments. First, asking everybody to vote and putting down an autonomous decision. Second, the manager concludes with his/her own verdict as the final decision after listening to everybody's viewpoint. Democratic approach works best when you need to motivate your employees by making them a part of the decision. However, you cannot cast off autocratic style completely, as it has its own benefits. For example, sometimes the manager has the vision and information to see things differently, or because workers or staff will be inclined towards a decision, which is more advantageous to them than the company. For all these reasons, manager have to make a decision that may not be well-liked by everyone, but in the end it is the manager who will be held responsible.

Analytical vs. Impulsive:
Analytical decision making approach is a scientific approach that involves mathematical, statistics, analytical software or any other mediums to examine the situation and finishing off with the most logical solution, whereas impulsive decision making works best when you have to make a decision, then and there. Both of these approaches are effective, problem occurs when somebody starts wasting time in analyzing when a quick decision is needed, or else when someone makes an impulsive decision when he/she was having all the time to analyze the situation and weigh different options.

About the author:
William King is the director of England Wholesale Suppliers , http://www.dailytrader.com/> Wholesale Trade Suppliers, Dropshippers, Distributors & Manufacturers and Australian Wholesalers, Suppliers & Distributors . He has 18 years of experience in the marketing and trading industries and has been helping retailers and startups with their product sourcing, promotion, marketing and supply chain requirements.

Article Source: http://www.Free-Articles-Zone.com